Summarize UK sanctions regulations and exemptions regarding Basic Needs Allowance, including any relevant definitions, in light of today’s FAQs, attached here. plesse provide your response for an audience of non-UK sanctions professonals who are not lawyers.
The final response:
The legal architecture beneath BNA
Primary legislation. The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 (SAMLA, 2018 c.13) is the enabling statute for essentially all post-Brexit UK sanctions. It doesn’t itself list licensing grounds – it authorises Treasury/the Secretary of State to make regime-specific secondary legislation.
Regime-specific regulations. Each sanctions regime (Russia, Iran, Syria, Belarus, Chemical Weapons, and so on) has its own statutory instrument made under SAMLA – for example the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/855). Each of these includes a schedule titled “Treasury licences: purposes,” which is the actual legal source of each licensing ground. I confirmed this schedule structure directly: in the Chemical Weapons (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/618), Schedule 2, paragraph 2, “Basic needs” reads almost exactly as you’d expect:
To enable the basic needs of a designated person, or (in the case of an individual) any dependent family member of such a person, to be met.
For individuals, it lists medical needs, food, insurance premiums, tax, rent or mortgage, and utility payments as included needs. The Russia Regulations carry the equivalent ground at Schedule 5, paragraph 2, though I wasn’t able to pull the exact Russia-specific wording (only confirmed its existence and paragraph position via secondary indices) – the substance is consistent across regimes but the schedule number and paragraph numbering differ regime to regime, so it’s worth checking the specific regulation rather than assuming identical numbering.
Where basic needs sits among the other grounds. Per OFSI’s own “How to apply for a financial sanctions licence” guidance, the generally available licensing grounds are:
basic needs
legal fees and expenses
prior obligations (pre-designation contracts)
routine holding or maintenance of frozen funds/economic resources
implementation of a judicial, administrative, or arbitral decision or lien
That page also confirms the general/specific licence mechanics I described earlier: general licences are issued by OFSI at its own initiative for a defined class of activity, and OFSI does not accept applications for them – you either fall within one or you apply for a specific licence.
The direct throughline to BNA
This is the most useful find. OFSI’s “Designated Individuals Licensing Principles” (a policy document sitting under the General Guidance, last updated 2 February 2026) already contained a formal benchmark for basic needs, at Principle 4:
Licensing should permit basic needs, which OFSI considers to include the reasonable standard of living as compared to a person receiving the net UK median wage.
And Principle 4(a): “Ordinarily, Principle 4 will be generally satisfied by granting a designated individual the net UK median wage.”
That’s a striking match to today’s BNA FAQs, with one difference worth flagging as a genuine shift rather than a restatement: the February principle benchmarks to the net UK median wage (an individual figure), while today’s FAQ benchmarks to a median income household. A household benchmark is not the same number as an individual wage benchmark – it implicitly accounts for household composition and dependents in a way a flat wage figure doesn’t. I can’t tell you from the FAQ text alone whether that’s a deliberate policy refinement or just looser drafting, but it’s the kind of distinction worth watching for in OFSI’s next General Guidance update, since it would change the actual capped amount a DP receives.
Historical background, clearly caveated as background rather than confirmed lineage: In 2023, litigation against OFSI (Fridman v HMT, the first challenge to an OFSI licensing decision under the Russia Regulations) resulted in disclosure of a previously secret internal “Basic Needs Framework,” which split basic needs into “core needs” (proposed to be met by a flat monthly sum pegged to median wage) versus needs beyond that. The High Court dismissed the claim and confirmed OFSI retains “residual discretion to refuse to grant a licence, even if the conditions for the grant of a licence are met” – a principle that reappears in today’s FAQ as “compliance with those conditions does not guarantee that a licence will be renewed or varied.” Commentators at the time (Law Gazette, November 2023) explicitly called for OFSI to formalise exactly this kind of standing monthly allowance rather than handling it case by case. I can’t point to a document that explicitly says “BNA is the formalisation of the Basic Needs Framework” – but the throughline from the 2023 disclosure, to the February 2026 Designated Individuals Licensing Principles, to today’s FAQ is consistent enough that I think it’s a fair inference, not a stretch.
A limitation worth being upfront about
I tried to independently verify FAQs 197-202 on OFSI’s live FAQ page. The version I could retrieve carries a “last updated” stamp of 29 May 2026, predating your attachment’s 21 July 2026 date – so I couldn’t cross-check the exact text against a live, independently-fetched copy; I’m relying on your attachment as the primary source for the BNA-specific content itself. What I can confirm independently is that the FAQ numbering, format, and “Added on:” convention in your document are consistent with OFSI’s genuine, ongoing FAQ series (which runs to at least FAQ 186 in the version I retrieved), so the document is stylistically and structurally what it claims to be – I just can’t yet corroborate the specific new entries from a second, independent live source.
Source list
Primary legislation and regulations
Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 (c.13) – legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/13
Chemical Weapons (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/618), Schedule 2, para 2 (“Basic needs”) – legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/618/schedule/2/paragraph/2/data.html
Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/855), regulation 64 and Schedule 5 – legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/855/regulation/64
OFSI guidance and policy
OFSI, “How to apply for a financial sanctions licence” (last updated 1 September 2025) – gov.uk/guidance/licences-that-allow-activity-prohibited-by-financial-sanctions
OFSI, “UK Financial Sanctions FAQs” (updated 29 May 2026 as retrieved) – gov.uk/government/publications/uk-financial-sanctions-faqs/uk-financial-sanctions-faqs
OFSI, “UK financial sanctions general guidance” (updated 28 January 2026) – gov.uk/government/publications/financial-sanctions-general-guidance/uk-financial-sanctions-general-guidance
OFSI Blog, “OFSI successfully defends first court review” (Fridman v HMT) – ofsi.blog.gov.uk/2023/11/28/ofsi-successfully-defends-first-court-review
Commentary (context on the pre-BNA “Basic Needs Framework”)
Law Gazette, “Sanctions: Time for a general licence to cover basic needs” (13 November 2023) – lawgazette.co.uk/practice-points/time-for-a-general-licence-to-cover-basic-needs/5117856.article
Corker Binning, same title/content (23 September 2024 mirror) – corkerbinning.com/time-for-a-general-licence-to-cover-basic-needs
OFSI has published FAQs 197-202 on Basic Needs Allowance (BNA) licences, which permit designated persons to access a capped monthly sum from frozen funds for essential living expenses. OFSI benchmarks the BNA against median household income. In many cases, including those involving high net worth individuals, the BNA will not provide for the continuation of a pre-designation standard of living.
FAQs 197-202 cover the purpose and scope of BNA licences, permitted expenditure, reporting requirements, treatment of monthly underspend, and how costs falling outside the BNA may be licensed separately.
The guidance is relevant to designated persons and any party facilitating payments under a BNA licence.
A Basic Needs Allowance (BNA) licence is a type of specific licence which OFSI may issue under the basic needs licensing ground across all non-counter-terrorism sanctions regimes. It permits a designated person (DP) to access a capped monthly sum from their otherwise frozen funds to meet essential day-to-day living expenses. OFSI benchmarks the allowance to reflect a median income household rather than the DP’s previous lifestyle or claimed expenditure. Rent or mortgage payments are considered separately from the BNA and assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Added on: 21 Jul 2026
198. What is the purpose of the basic needs allowance?
The basic needs allowance is intended to help ensure that a DP and any financially dependent family members can meet their day-to-day living costs, broadly in line with a median-income household. It is not intended to enable a DP to maintain the lifestyle, wealth, or business activities they enjoyed prior to designation.
DPs applying for or operating under a BNA licence should ensure that expenditure remains consistent with this purpose. Any party facilitating payments under a BNAlicence should similarly satisfy itself that the payments fall within the terms and purpose of the licence.
Added on: 21 Jul 2026
199. Do basic needs allowance licences include reporting requirements?
Yes. Basic needs allowance licences include reporting conditions requiring expenditure to be evidenced and reported to OFSI. This is a proportionate method that enables OFSI to maintain oversight of the usage of the licence and may inform any future decision when licences are renewed or varied.
Applicants should be prepared to comply with any reporting requirements imposed as conditions of a licence. Compliance with those conditions does not guarantee that a licence will be renewed or varied.
Added on: 21 Jul 2026
200. What can the basic needs allowance be spent on?
OFSI does not provide an exhaustive list of approved purchases. A DP has broad discretion, though not total, in how the allowance is used. That discretion is limited by the terms of the licence, the relevant sanctions regulations, and the purpose for which the licence is granted
The allowance is intended to cover goods and services that reasonably constitute basic needs. This may include (but is not limited to) food, clothing, personal hygiene, local transport, basic household items, and hairdressers. It does not cover expenditure that falls outside the terms of the basic needs licencing purpose, nor expenditure which would otherwise breach the financial sanction’s regime.
Some discretionary spending may be consistent with the terms of a BNA where it supports basic family life and remains proportionate to the benchmark of a median-income household. This may include recreation, education, leisure, and other miscellaneous goods and services. Whether such expenditure is appropriate will depend on the circumstances and must remain consistent with the purpose of the licence.
Added on: 21 Jul 2026
201. Does the basic needs allowance licence permit carry-over of any monthly underspend?
No. Each month’s allowance is a fixed, standalone cap. If a DP does not use the full allowance in a given month, the unspent amount cannot be carried forward or added to the following month’s allowance. The monthly cap resets at the start of each new month.
Added on: 21 Jul 2026
202. Does OFSI license costs separately that may fall outside of the core basic needs allowance?
Yes. Where a cost cannot reasonably be met from the basic needs allowance, OFSI may consider a separate licence application. Such applications are assessed on their individual merits and approval is not automatic.
OFSI will consider whether the relevant cost could reasonably be met from within the basic needs allowance. In particular, OFSI will assess whether the expenditure is of a type that a median-income household would ordinarily absorb through routine day-to-day spending.
Where a cost could reasonably be met from the basic needs allowance, OFSI would generally expect it to be funded from that allowance rather than licensed separately.
Today, Friday 17 July , the UK Government has designated the following 6 individuals and 2 entities under the Democratic Republic of the Congo Sanctions Regime. This reflects the decision to designate these individuals made by the UN Security Council Sanctions Committee pursuant to Resolution 1533 (2004) on 14 July.
Additionally, the following entity has been revoked under the Libya Sanctions Regime
On 16 July 2026, the Arbitration Costs General Licence (INT/2025/5787748) has been amended to update the reporting requirement.
Any persons intending to use General Licence INT/2025/5787748 should consult the copy of the Licence for full details of the permissions and usage requirements.
Today, Thursday 16 July, the UK Government has designated the following 4 individuals and 7 entities under the Sudan Sanctions Regime. This reflects the decision to designate these individuals made by the Foreign Secretary, targeting the conflict gold trade, procurement networks and financial facilitators that are fuelling Sudan’s war.
UK announces Sudan sanctions package targeting illicit gold and finance networks sustaining the war
UK calls for UN arms embargo to cover El Obeid as city on the precipice of major atrocity
Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper says UK will tackle those fuelling the conflict.
The UK has today announced sanctions targeting the conflict gold trade in Sudan, procurement networks and financial facilitators that are fuelling Sudan’s war.
Sudan’s booming gold industry is the engine of its war economy. While official gold exports were worth $1.5 billion in 2024 and 2025, the true value of the sector is estimated to be several times higher, with billions of dollars’ worth of gold smuggled out of Sudan each year through illicit channels, helping finance weapons procurement, military operations and the activities of armed groups.
These measures target eleven individuals and entities suspected of being linked to the financing, procurement and commercial networks supporting the RSF or the SAF and fuelling Sudan’s conflict. All are Sudanese but they trade internationally including in the gold markets in Dubai and Hong Kong.
At the centre of the package is Sudanese national Abu Dharr, suspected of being a notorious RSF financier and procurement facilitator. He is suspected of having helped fund and sustain RSF operations from beyond Sudan’s borders through a web of real estate, conflict gold, and holding companies based in Dubai.
Vast quantities of Sudanese gold continue to be monetised before entering global markets, making it a critical gateway for revenues generated by Sudan’s illicit gold sector.
By targeting these companies and facilitators, the UK is exposing and disrupting key commercial networks that help convert Sudan’s gold wealth into revenue that sustains the conflict.
Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said:
“The people of Sudan continue to pay the price for a war fuelled not only by guns and fighters, but by illicit flows of gold and finance to fill the war chests on both sides. These sanctions are targeting Sudan’s war economy and they will shine a light on those who seek to profit from these illegal shadow networks.
“As the world watches the deeply alarming build-up around El Obeid, we continue to call on the RSF to halt their assault. And we are making clear that those enabling atrocities, from the battlefield to the boardroom, will be held accountable.”
The sanctions come as the UK and international partners are on red alert, monitoring the deteriorating situation in El Obeid, where the RSF is building up surge forces around a city already under immense humanitarian pressure.
The UK has warned that El Obeid is at risk of becoming the scene of another mass atrocity, following the horrors witnessed in El Fasher. Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper has called for the UN arms embargo to be extended to reach El Obeid.
Illicit gold will be a priority theme at the UK’s Illicit Finance Summit, due to take place in London in December 2026. The Summit will bring together governments, civil society and the private sector to build an international coalition to tackle flows of dirty money around the world, including the trade in illicit gold.
· Abu Dharr Abdul Nabi Habiballa Ahmmed – RSF financier and procurement facilitator suspected of using a network of companies to secure funding, move money and support RSF operations.
· Prodigious Real Estate Management Supervision Services – Sudanese UAE-based company suspected of being part of Abu Dharr’s commercial network used to support RSF financing activities.
· Mazin Fadlalla – RSF-linked procurement operative suspected of being involved in acquiring funding, equipment and materiel for the RSF.
· Ahmed Hashim – RSF- linked procurement operative suspected of being involved in sourcing funding and supplies for the RSF.
· Natwest Logistics – Sudanese UAE-based company suspected of being used by Mazin Fadlalla and Ahmed Hashim to support RSF procurement and logistics activities.
· Aoun Commercial Brokers – Sudanese UAE-based company suspected of being used by Mazin Fadlalla and Ahmed Hashim to facilitate procurement and financial transactions for the RSF.
· Ahmad Abdalla – Procurement operative linked to the SAF and Defence Industries Systems (DIS), suspected of being involved in securing weapons, equipment and funding for the SAF.
·Portex Trade Limited – Sudanese Hong Kong-based company suspected of being used by Ahmad Abdalla to support SAF procurement activity and evade existing sanctions restrictions.
· Omdurman Mining – Sudanese state-owned mining company suspected of generating gold revenues that support the SAF’s war effort.
· Ariab Mining Company – Sudanese state-owned mining company suspected of involvement in illicit gold activities that generate revenue for the SAF.
· Sudamin Company Ltd – Sudanese state-owned mining company linked to Sudan’s gold sector and suspected of channelling revenue from conflict gold to both the SAF and RSF, including through past links to sanctioned company Al Junaid.
Note, however, that the link to the Sanctions Notice in the email from OFSI was to the Global Human Rights program… I went out and found this the hard way…
Any persons intending to use General Licence INT/2025/6641960 should consult the copy of the Licence for full details of the permissions and usage requirements.
\
