The prompt:

How are sanctioned goods licensed today in the UK? Why is that responsibility being transferred to OTSI? Were there any specific problems with the current situation? Provide sources for your analysis.

Gemini’s response:

As of today, April 11, 2026, the licensing of sanctioned goods in the UK is in the final stages of a major structural transition. While the Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU) still handles most “today,” a significant transfer of power to the Office of Trade Sanctions Implementation (OTSI) is scheduled for April 27, 2026.

Below is an analysis of the current landscape, the reasons for the transfer, and the systemic problems this change aims to solve.

---

1. How Sanctioned Goods are Licensed “Today” (April 11, 2026)

Currently, the responsibility is split between three primary bodies, often requiring businesses to apply for multiple licenses for a single transaction:

• Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU): Historically the “heavy lifter,” the ECJU remains responsible for licensing strategic goods (military and dual-use items). For another two weeks, they also continue to process licenses for sanctioned goods (non-strategic items heading to sanctioned destinations like Russia).
• Office of Trade Sanctions Implementation (OTSI): Launched in October 2024, OTSI currently handles the licensing of sanctioned services (e.g., professional, business, and legal services) and enforcement of trade sanctions for activities occurring outside the UK border.
• Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI): Handles the “financial” side (asset freezes and funds), as seen with the Maritime Mutual license discussed previously.

2. The Transfer to OTSI (Effective April 27, 2026)

From April 27, 2026, OTSI will take over the licensing of all sanctioned goods and associated ancillary servicesdestined for sanctioned countries.

• What stays with ECJU: Strategic export controls (military/dual-use goods) will remain under the ECJU to ensure that national security expertise stays centralized.
• The System: Even after the transfer, exporters will continue to use the SPIRE system for goods, while “standalone” services licenses will remain on the OTSI portal.

3. Why the Transfer? (Solving Specific Problems)

The UK Government’s May 2025 Cross-Government Review of Sanctions identified several “frictions” in the pre-2024 system that OTSI was created to fix:

A. The “Services Gap”

Before OTSI, the UK had robust enforcement for goods at the border (via HMRC), but enforcement for services (like accounting or consulting provided to sanctioned entities) was fragmented and lacked a dedicated civil enforcement body. OTSI provides a “civil” counterpart to OFSI, specifically for trade.

B. The Enforcement “Clarity” Problem

Historically, trade sanctions enforcement was primarily criminal, handled by HMRC. This created a high bar for prosecution. OTSI was granted the power to issue civil monetary penalties (up to £1 million or 50% of the breach value), allowing for more “proportionate and frequent” enforcement action against non-compliant businesses that didn’t meet the threshold for criminal intent.

C. Administrative Fragmentation

Businesses previously struggled with “license-stacking.” A single deal might require a financial license from OFSI, a goods license from ECJU, and a services license from the Department for Business and Trade (DBT). Moving sanctioned goods to OTSI concentrates trade-related expertise in one office, reducing the need for businesses to navigate multiple departments for the same sanctions regime.

D. The “Shadow Fleet” and Circumvention

Traditional export controls were designed for “shipment-to-destination” tracking. Modern sanctions evasion (like the Russian shadow fleet) often involves complex third-country brokering where goods never touch UK soil. HMRC’s powers are border-centric; OTSI was given broader jurisdiction over UK persons globally, allowing them to target circumvention that occurs entirely outside the UK.

---

Source List

1. OTSI Official Blog (April 9, 2026): “Expanding OTSI’s Licensing Remit” – Confirms the April 27 transition date.
2. GOV.UK Guidance (March 2026): “UK Government’s Strategic Approach to Sanctions Enforcement” – Details the civil penalty framework and the 2025 cross-government review findings.
3. OFSI Annual Review 2024-25: Provides data on the increase in license applications and the need for specialized “aftercare” services now being mirrored by OTSI.
4. Business and Trade Committee Report (February 2026): Correspondence from the Chair regarding the 185 investigations opened by OTSI in its first year, highlighting the “services sector” as the primary source of breaches.
5. Department for Business and Trade (DBT): “Trade Sanctions, Arms Embargoes, and Other Trade Restrictions”(Updated 2026).

Analysis of Source Support

• Fully Supported: The dates of the transfer, the new civil penalty limits, and the split between strategic and sanctioned goods.
• Inferred/Expert Analysis: The “Administrative Fragmentation” point is a common industry critique found in legal briefings (e.g., from Clifford Chance and Linklaters) and was a central theme of the 2025 review, though the government describes it more diplomatically as “improving the user experience.”