Category: New General License Version

  • Issuance of Amended Venezuela-related General Licenses and Associated Frequently Asked Questions

    Release Date

    08/27/2026

    Recent Actions Body

    The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Venezuela-related General License 46D, “Authorizing Certain Activities Involving Venezuelan-Origin Oil or Petrochemical Products;” Venezuela-related General License 47B, “Authorizing the Sale of U.S.-Origin Diluents to Venezuela;” Venezuela-related General License 48C, “Authorizing the Supply of Certain Items and Services to Venezuela;” Venezuela-related General License 50C, “Authorizing Transactions Related to Oil or Gas Sector Operations in Venezuela of Certain Entities;” Venezuela-related General License 51C, “Authorizing Certain Activities Involving Venezuelan-Origin Minerals, Including Gold;” Venezuela-related General License 52B, “Authorizing Certain Transactions Involving Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A.;” Venezuela-related General License 54B, “Authorizing the Supply of Certain Items and Services for Minerals Operations in Venezuela;” and Venezuela-related General License 61A, “Authorizing the Supply of Certain Items and Services to Venezuela Related to Telecommunications.”

    Additionally, OFAC is issuing two new Venezuela-related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs 1267 and 1268), amending two Venezuela-related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs 1233 and 1244), and archiving FAQ 1260.

    Claude explains the difference:

    What’s new is that OFAC fully removed the separate governing-law requirement, the clause requiring contract terms to be “construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of a state or other jurisdiction within the United States.” So the two conditions that used to travel together (US governing law + dispute resolution venue) have been decoupled, and only the dispute-resolution piece survives. That’s the substantive change behind your two new FAQs:

    • FAQ 1267 (new): Asks whether the amended GLs still require a choice-of-law provision. Answer: no, effective Aug 27, 2026. OFAC states the rationale as responding to “investment-related reforms made by the GOV since January 2026.” It doesn’t name Venezuela’s Hydrocarbons Law amendment specifically, so connecting the two is my inference based on outside reporting, not something OFAC states in the FAQ itself.
    • FAQ 1268 (new): Confirms the dispute-resolution-venue requirement itself is untouched, and adds a clarifying line that the requirement “relates to the jurisdiction in which dispute resolution proceedings must occur, rather than the law governing the underlying contract.”
  • First, Counter-Terrorism GL 36 (Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Autistici Inventati):

    Second, Russia GL 104B (Authorizing Transactions Related to Imports of Certain Diamonds Prohibited by Executive Order 14068):

  • While Claude is chugging through the massive update today (a press chart, 2 Treasury PRs, 3 State PRs, and a fact sheet), I’m going to post the other part…

    First, Russia-related General License 131I (Authorizing Certain Transactions for the Negotiation of and Entry Into Contingent Contracts for the Sale of Lukoil International GmbH and Related Maintenance Activities):

    And OFAC updated 2 related Russian Frequently-Asked Questions again – 1224:

    1224. What negotiations does Russia-related General License 131I authorize, and what transaction conditions will OFAC consider when evaluating requests for further authorization to effectuate a sale of Lukoil International GmbH (LIG) assets?

    Answer

    On October 22, 2025, OFAC designated Public Joint-Stock Company Oil Company Lukoil (Lukoil) to increase pressure on Russia’s energy sector and degrade Russia’s ability to raise revenue for its war machine. OFAC is aware of potential efforts by Lukoil to divest its assets outside of Russia to non-blocked parties, given the impact of sanctions. To support such divestments and further cut off funding to Russia, OFAC issued Russia-related General License (GL) 131I, which authorizes negotiations and entry into contingent contracts with Lukoil for the sale of LIG or any of LIG’s majority-owned subsidiaries. Authorized activities include negotiations on terms for definitive agreements and financial, legal, or operational due diligence, including engagement of outside counsel or advisors. GL 131I expires on September 19, 2026.

    GL 131I does not authorize transactions to effectuate the actual sale, disposition, or transfer of any LIG entity or asset. Any contract entered into pursuant to GL 131I must expressly be made contingent upon the receipt of a separate authorization from OFAC. The goal of OFAC’s Russia sanctions is to place pressure on Moscow to end its war.

    As such, Treasury would evaluate any proposed sale of LIG based on factors that support U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. OFAC expects that, at a minimum, the proposed transaction must: completely sever LIG’s ties with Lukoil; block any funds owed to Lukoil until sanctions are lifted by placing them in an account subject to U.S. jurisdiction; and not provide a windfall to Lukoil, such as by providing up-front value to Lukoil, including through asset or share swaps. Further, as a condition of any future license for effectuating a sale of LIG, OFAC expects that it will require persons purchasing LIG’s assets to seek OFAC review before further divestment of material LIG assets.

    OFAC may revoke GL 131I at any time, including if Lukoil and LIG do not appear to be engaging in good faith negotiations regarding the divestment of LIG or its assets.

    Date Updated: August 20, 2026

    Date Released

    November 19, 2025

    and 1225:

    1225. What activities do Russia-related General License 128C and General License 131I authorize related to Lukoil International GmbH (LIG)?

    Answer

    OFAC has issued two General Licenses (GLs) relating specifically to Lukoil International GmbH (LIG) and its majority-owned subsidiaries (“LIG Entities”): GL 128C and GL 131I. The GLs are similar but have different expiration dates and terms as each serves a different purpose.

    • To mitigate the effects of Lukoil’s OFAC designation on retail consumers, OFAC issued on December 4, 2025 GL 128B to authorize maintenance, operation, and wind down activities for a narrow range of LIG entities, specifically Lukoil retail automobile service stations outside of the Russian Federation. OFAC subsequently issued GL 128C to extend the existing authorization until October 29, 2026.
    • To enable Lukoil to divest its assets outside of Russia to non-blocked parties, OFAC issued on December 10, 2025 GL 131A to authorize, among other things, maintenance and wind down activities of all LIG Entities. OFAC subsequently issued GLs 131B, 131C, 131D, GL 131E, GL 131F, GL 131G, GL 131H, and GL 131I, to extend the existing authorization until September 19, 2026. Please see Frequently Asked Question 1224 for additional information on authorizations regarding negotiations for the sale of LIG Entities.

    GL 128C and GL 131I expressly authorize transactions undertaken in the ordinary course of business, provided that the transactions do not involve any blocked persons other than the LIG Entities described in GL 128C and GL 131I. Transactions undertaken in the ordinary course of business may involve (but are not limited to): supply of motor fuel and lubricants; lease payments; insurance payments; property maintenance and environmental services; employee payroll, benefits, severance, and reimbursements; information technology services; payments to government authorities; legal services and proceedings; payments to suppliers, landlords, lenders, and partners; the preservation and upkeep of pre-existing tangible property; and activities associated with maintaining pre-existing capital investments. Also, both GL 128C and GL 131I authorize transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to performing pre-existing agreements and conducting intracompany transfers, provided that such transactions are consistent with previously established practices and support pre-existing projects or operations, consistent with the terms of the respective authorizations.

    Both GL 128C and GL 131I also authorize financial institutions, payment processors, and other entities to use, debit, and credit the accounts of the relevant LIG Entities to effectuate the respective authorizations, but both GLs are also expressly limited by the condition that no funds may be transferred to a person or account in the Russian Federation.

    Non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. sanctions under E.O. 14024 for engaging in transactions with blocked persons that are generally authorized for U.S. persons, including for those authorized by GL 128C and GL 131I. Similarly, non-U.S. persons may rely upon GL 128C and GL 131I regardless of whether a foreign financial institution maintains blocked accounts, provided the non-U.S. person’s activities are consistent with the terms of GL 128C and GL 131I, including the requirement that no payments may be transferred to any person or account located in the Russian Federation.

    Date Updated: August 20, 2026

    Date Released

    December 4, 2025

    as well as Cuba FAQ 1265:

    1265. On August 20, 2026, the Department of State designated the Ministry of Construction of Cuba (MICONS) pursuant to E.O. 14404.  Are foreign persons, including foreign financial institutions (FFIs), subject to sanctions risk for transacting with MICONS?

    Answer

    The U.S. government does not intend to target foreign persons, including FFIs, pursuant to E.O. 14404 for engaging in transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of transactions involving MICONS, or any entity in which MICONS owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, through September 19, 2026. However, non-U.S. persons, including FFIs, should proceed with caution in any dealings with a party sanctioned under this authority. Actions to return assets to a sanctioned party or transfer them to another jurisdiction for potential use by the target could expose non-U.S. persons to significant sanctions risk.

    Foreign persons unable to wind down transactions involving MICONS, or any entity in which MICONS owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, before September 19, 2026, are encouraged to contact the OFAC Compliance Hotline.

    Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including U.S. persons and entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons, should additionally note that this limited non-targeting posture does not authorize any transaction prohibited by the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR), 31 CFR part 515, or any other OFAC sanctions authority. Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction have long been prohibited from transacting with MICONS, including in connection with a non-U.S. person’s wind down of activities with MICONS, absent OFAC authorization. Relevant authorizations may include humanitarian-related transactions authorized under the CACR in subpart E of part 515 and under E.O. 14404 via General License (GL) 1.  For additional information on GL 1, see FAQ 1253. 

    Date Released

    August 20, 2026

  • Yes, OFAC’s Venezuela GL 5 is up to the Y revision:

    and there is an updated FAQ 595, too

    595. What does Venezuela-related General License 5Y authorize?

    Answer

    The President issued Executive Order (E.O.) 13835 on May 21, 2018. Subsection 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13835 prohibits U.S. persons from engaging in transactions related to the sale, transfer, assignment, or pledging as collateral by the Government of Venezuela (GOV) of any equity interest in an entity owned 50 percent or more by the GOV. One effect of subsection 1(a)(iii) is to require authorization before U.S. persons may engage in certain transactions regarding any equity interest in an entity owned 50 percent or more by the GOV. Subsequent to the issuance of E.O. 13835, OFAC received inquiries about how and whether subsection 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13835 could affect the ability to enforce bondholder rights to the CITGO shares serving as collateral for the Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA) 2020 8.5 percent bond. OFAC issued General License (GL) 5 on July 19, 2018, which removed E.O. 13835 as an obstacle to holders of the PdVSA 2020 8.5 percent bond gaining access to their collateral.

    General License 5 was replaced and superseded by General License 5A on October 24, 2019 with a delay in the effectiveness of the authorization in the general license. Since that date, OFAC has extended the delay in effectiveness multiple times. Most recently, OFAC issued General License 5Y on August 3, 2026, which further delays the effectiveness of the authorization in GL 5 until September 17, 2026. Between October 24, 2019 and September 17, 2026 (the date the authorization in General License 5Y becomes effective), there is no authorization in effect that licenses against subsection 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13835 applicable to the holders of the PdVSA 2020 8.5 percent bond. As a result, during such period, transactions related to the sale or transfer of CITGO shares in connection with the PdVSA 2020 8.5 percent bond are prohibited, unless specifically authorized by OFAC.

    To the extent an agreement may be reached on proposals to restructure or refinance payments due to the holders of the PdVSA 2020 8.5 percent bond, additional licensing requirements may apply. OFAC would encourage parties to apply for a specific license and would have a favorable licensing policy toward such an agreement.

    Date Updated: August 03, 2026

    Date Released

    January 20, 2022

  • Today, OFAC issued Russian-related General License 131H:

    and amended related Frequently Asked Questions 1224:

    1224. What negotiations does Russia-related General License 131H authorize, and what transaction conditions will OFAC consider when evaluating requests for further authorization to effectuate a sale of Lukoil International GmbH (LIG) assets?

    Answer

    On October 22, 2025, OFAC designated Public Joint-Stock Company Oil Company Lukoil (Lukoil) to increase pressure on Russia’s energy sector and degrade Russia’s ability to raise revenue for its war machine. OFAC is aware of potential efforts by Lukoil to divest its assets outside of Russia to non-blocked parties, given the impact of sanctions. To support such divestments and further cut off funding to Russia, OFAC issued Russia-related General License (GL) 131H, which authorizes negotiations and entry into contingent contracts with Lukoil for the sale of LIG or any of LIG’s majority-owned subsidiaries. Authorized activities include negotiations on terms for definitive agreements and financial, legal, or operational due diligence, including engagement of outside counsel or advisors. GL 131H expires on August 22, 2026.

    GL 131H does not authorize transactions to effectuate the actual sale, disposition, or transfer of any LIG entity or asset. Any contract entered into pursuant to GL 131H must expressly be made contingent upon the receipt of a separate authorization from OFAC. The goal of OFAC’s Russia sanctions is to place pressure on Moscow to end its war.

    As such, Treasury would evaluate any proposed sale of LIG based on factors that support U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. OFAC expects that, at a minimum, the proposed transaction must: completely sever LIG’s ties with Lukoil; block any funds owed to Lukoil until sanctions are lifted by placing them in an account subject to U.S. jurisdiction; and not provide a windfall to Lukoil, such as by providing up-front value to Lukoil, including through asset or share swaps. Further, as a condition of any future license for effectuating a sale of LIG, OFAC expects that it will require persons purchasing LIG’s assets to seek OFAC review before further divestment of material LIG assets.

    OFAC may revoke GL 131H at any time, including if Lukoil and LIG do not appear to be engaging in good faith negotiations regarding the divestment of LIG or its assets.

    Date Updated: July 24, 2026

    Date Released

    November 19, 2025

    and 1225:

    1225. What activities do Russia-related General License 128C and General License 131Hauthorize related to Lukoil International GmbH (LIG)?

    Answer

    OFAC has issued two General Licenses (GLs) relating specifically to Lukoil International GmbH (LIG) and its majority-owned subsidiaries (“LIG Entities”): GL 128C and GL 131H. The GLs are similar but have different expiration dates and terms as each serves a different purpose.

    • To mitigate the effects of Lukoil’s OFAC designation on retail consumers, OFAC issued on December 4, 2025 GL 128B to authorize maintenance, operation, and wind down activities for a narrow range of LIG entities, specifically Lukoil retail automobile service stations outside of the Russian Federation. OFAC subsequently issued GL 128C to extend the existing authorization until October 29, 2026.
    • To enable Lukoil to divest its assets outside of Russia to non-blocked parties, OFAC issued on December 10, 2025 GL 131A to authorize, among other things, maintenance and wind down activities of all LIG Entities. OFAC subsequently issued GLs 131B, 131C, 131D, GL 131E, GL 131F, GL 131G, and GL 131H, to extend the existing authorization until August 22, 2026. Please see Frequently Asked Question 1224 for additional information on authorizations regarding negotiations for the sale of LIG Entities.

    GL 128C and GL 131H expressly authorize transactions undertaken in the ordinary course of business, provided that the transactions do not involve any blocked persons other than the LIG Entities described in GL 128C and GL 131H. Transactions undertaken in the ordinary course of business may involve (but are not limited to): supply of motor fuel and lubricants; lease payments; insurance payments; property maintenance and environmental services; employee payroll, benefits, severance, and reimbursements; information technology services; payments to government authorities; legal services and proceedings; payments to suppliers, landlords, lenders, and partners; the preservation and upkeep of pre-existing tangible property; and activities associated with maintaining pre-existing capital investments. Also, both GL 128C and GL 131H authorize transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to performing pre-existing agreements and conducting intracompany transfers, provided that such transactions are consistent with previously established practices and support pre-existing projects or operations, consistent with the terms of the respective authorizations.

    Both GL 128C and GL 131H also authorize financial institutions, payment processors, and other entities to use, debit, and credit the accounts of the relevant LIG Entities to effectuate the respective authorizations, but both GLs are also expressly limited by the condition that no funds may be transferred to a person or account in the Russian Federation.

    Non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. sanctions under E.O. 14024 for engaging in transactions with blocked persons that are generally authorized for U.S. persons, including for those authorized by GL 128C and GL 131H. Similarly, non-U.S. persons may rely upon GL 128C and GL 131H regardless of whether a foreign financial institution maintains blocked accounts, provided the non-U.S. person’s activities are consistent with the terms of GL 128C and GL 131H, including the requirement that no payments may be transferred to any person or account located in the Russian Federation.

    Date Updated: July 24, 2026

    Date Released

    December 4, 2025

    as well as Venezuela FAQ 1239:

    1239. Where can I find the account information to make authorized payments to the Foreign Government Deposit Funds deposit account, as specified in Executive Order 14373?

    Answer

    To obtain payment account information for payments to the Foreign Government Deposit Funds deposit account established consistent with Executive Order (E.O.) 14373, “Safeguarding Venezuelan Oil Revenue for the Good of the American and Venezuelan People,” and referenced in certain Venezuela General Licenses, depositors must first email the official point of contact for the deposit account at: DepositorInquiries@state.gov. Potential depositors that fail to contact this email inbox and provide the requested transaction details may have their deposits rejected. Potential depositors should be prepared to provide all relevant transaction details, including the following, as appropriate:

    • Full legal names and addresses of corporate depositor and all contract parties (provide subsidiary information, as applicable);
    • Detailed description of the underlying contract or obligation, including the purpose and nature of the payment (include information on the type of product and amount purchased and/or sold);
    • Date of sale and copies of the corresponding invoice(s), contract number(s), and any relevant reference identifiers;
    • Total payment amount, currency, and proposed payment date(s);
    • Identification of the license authorizing the transaction;
    • Copies of any other transaction record(s) to validate the deposit; and
    • Primary point of contact for any follow-up questions, including name, title, telephone number, and email address.

    Once the Department of State has provided payment account information and the deposit has been made and accepted, the depositor will receive a confirmation email acknowledging the deposit, which can be used to inform all contract parties involved in the transaction.

    Date Updated: July 24, 2026

    Date Released

    March 4, 2026

    Finally, OFAC issued a new final rule:

    The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is adopting a final rule to update website and contact information in certain parts of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Additionally, OFAC is amending one CFR part to update general licenses authorizing payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States to replace the reporting requirement in the general license with a recordkeeping requirement and correcting typographical errors in two CFR parts. OFAC is also updating a part of 31 CFR chapter V to correct an erroneous cross-reference.

    Here’s the final rule:

  • Today, OFAC issued Russia-related General License 13R:

    and updated 2 Frequently Asked Questions:

    1118. As of December 2022, the Government of the Russian Federation may require a so-called “exit tax” payment prior to the divestment of assets located in the Russian Federation, potentially requiring transactions involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation. Do U.S. sanctions prohibit the payment of this so-called “exit tax”? Does Russia-related General License (GL) 13R authorize transactions that involve the payment of this exit tax? 

    Directive 4 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, “Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation,” as amended (Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive), prohibits the following activities by U.S. persons: any transaction involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, including any transfer of assets to such entities or any foreign exchange transaction for or on behalf of such entities (collectively, “Directive 4 entities”). As noted in FAQ 1002, this includes both direct and indirect transactions.

    OFAC issued the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive with the explicit aim of preventing the Government of the Russian Federation from leveraging these institutions and their holdings of international reserves in ways that would undermine the impact of U.S. sanctions. Information currently available to OFAC suggests so-called “exit taxes” imposed by the Government of the Russian Federation involve payments to Directive 4 entities. Consequently, U.S. persons whose divestment from the Russian Federation will involve the payment of such an exit tax require a specific license from OFAC prior to the payment of such tax, unless otherwise authorized by OFAC.

    GL 13R authorizes U.S. persons, or entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, to pay taxes, fees, or import duties, and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, or certifications involving Directive 4 entities that would otherwise be prohibited by the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to such persons’ day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation. Payment of exit taxes is not considered ordinarily incident and necessary to day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation and, thus, is not authorized under GL 13R.

    Therefore, U.S. persons whose divestment of assets in the Russian Federation will involve a payment of such an “exit tax” should seek a specific license from OFAC. Such persons may submit a request for a specific license with OFAC’s Licensing Division online at https://ofac.treasury.gov/ofac-license-application-page. License applications related to these payments should include information regarding the amount of the exit tax, the amount of ongoing taxes that would otherwise be paid to the Government of the Russian Federation should divestment not occur, the impact of a failure to pay the tax on the employees of the exiting company, the specific economic activity in Russia of the exiting company, and the impact on the Russian Federation of the divestment. OFAC will expedite its review of such requests, which will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

    While OFAC is aware that the Commission established by the Russian Federation to review such divestments may include individuals from entities subject to the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive or individuals listed on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List, U.S. persons do not need to seek authorization from OFAC for their Russian buyers to submit an application to the Commission regarding a divestment transaction.

    Date Updated: July 08, 2026

    Updated on Jul 08, 2026

    Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions

    999. What authorizations exist for entities subject to Directive 4 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, “Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation,” as amended (Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive)? 

    OFAC issued Russia-related General License (GL) 132 to authorize transactions involving the Paks II civil nuclear power plant project in Hungary, including those involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, that would be prohibited by the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive.

    OFAC issued Russia-related General License (GL) 115D to authorize civil nuclear energy-related transactions, including those involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, that would be prohibited by the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive.

    OFAC issued GL 13R to authorize U.S. persons to pay taxes, fees, or import duties and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, or certifications, to the extent such transactions are prohibited by the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to such persons’ day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation. For further information on the types of transactions authorized by GL 13R, see FAQ 1118.

    OFAC also issued GL 14, authorizing certain transactions involving any Directive 4 entity where the Directive 4 entity’s sole function in the transaction is to act as an operator of a clearing and settlement system. GL 14 does not authorize any transfer of assets to or from any Directive 4 entity, or any transaction where a Directive 4 entity is either a counterparty or beneficiary to the transaction. In addition, GL 14 does not authorize any debit to an account on the books of a U.S. financial institution of any Directive 4 entity. See FAQ 1003.

    Note that GL 13R, GL 14, GL 115D, and GL 132 continue to authorize against the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive.

    Date Updated: July 08, 2026

    Updated on Jul 08, 2026

  • We found out today – witness Iran-related General License X1 (Revocation and Wind Down of June 21, 2026 Authorization for the Production, Delivery and Sale of Crude Oil, Petrochemical Products, and Petroleum Products of Iranian Origin):

  • Here’s GL 131G:

    And updated FAQs 1224 and 1225:

    1225. What activities do Russia-related General License 128C and General License 131G authorize related to Lukoil International GmbH (LIG)? 

    OFAC has issued two General Licenses (GLs) relating specifically to Lukoil International GmbH (LIG) and its majority-owned subsidiaries (“LIG Entities”): GL 128C and GL 131G. The GLs are similar but have different expiration dates and terms as each serves a different purpose.

    • To mitigate the effects of Lukoil’s OFAC designation on retail consumers, OFAC issued on December 4, 2025 GL 128B to authorize maintenance, operation, and wind down activities for a narrow range of LIG entities, specifically Lukoil retail automobile service stations outside of the Russian Federation. OFAC subsequently issued GL 128C to extend the existing authorization until October 29, 2026.
    • To enable Lukoil to divest its assets outside of Russia to non-blocked parties, OFAC issued on December 10, 2025 GL 131A to authorize, among other things, maintenance and wind down activities of all LIG Entities. OFAC subsequently issued GLs 131B, 131C, 131D, 131E, 131F, and 131G to extend the existing authorization until July 25, 2026. Please see Frequently Asked Question 1224 for additional information on authorizations regarding negotiations for the sale of LIG Entities.

    GL 128C and GL 131G expressly authorize transactions undertaken in the ordinary course of business, provided that the transactions do not involve any blocked persons other than the LIG Entities described in GL 128C and GL 131G. Transactions undertaken in the ordinary course of business may involve (but are not limited to): supply of motor fuel and lubricants; lease payments; insurance payments; property maintenance and environmental services; employee payroll, benefits, severance, and reimbursements; information technology services; payments to government authorities; legal services and proceedings; payments to suppliers, landlords, lenders, and partners; the preservation and upkeep of pre-existing tangible property; and activities associated with maintaining pre-existing capital investments. Also, both GL 128C and GL 131G authorize transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to performing pre-existing agreements and conducting intracompany transfers, provided that such transactions are consistent with previously established practices and support pre-existing projects or operations, consistent with the terms of the respective authorizations.

    Both GL 128C and GL 131G also authorize financial institutions, payment processors, and other entities to use, debit, and credit the accounts of the relevant LIG Entities to effectuate the respective authorizations, but both GLs are also expressly limited by the condition that no funds may be transferred to a person or account in the Russian Federation.

    Non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. sanctions under E.O. 14024 for engaging in transactions with blocked persons that are generally authorized for U.S. persons, including for those authorized by GL 128C and GL 131G. Similarly, non-U.S. persons may rely upon GL 128C and GL 131G regardless of whether a foreign financial institution maintains blocked accounts, provided the non-U.S. person’s activities are consistent with the terms of GL 128C and GL 131G, including the requirement that no payments may be transferred to any person or account located in the Russian Federation.

    Date Updated: June 25, 2026

    Updated on Jun 25, 2026

    Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions

    1224. What negotiations does Russia-related General License 131G authorize, and what transaction conditions will OFAC consider when evaluating requests for further authorization to effectuate a sale of Lukoil International GmbH (LIG) assets? 

    On October 22, 2025, OFAC designated Public Joint-Stock Company Oil Company Lukoil (Lukoil) to increase pressure on Russia’s energy sector and degrade Russia’s ability to raise revenue for its war machine. OFAC is aware of potential efforts by Lukoil to divest its assets outside of Russia to non-blocked parties, given the impact of sanctions. To support such divestments and further cut off funding to Russia, OFAC issued Russia-related General License (GL) 131G, which authorizes negotiations and entry into contingent contracts with Lukoil for the sale of LIG or any of LIG’s majority-owned subsidiaries. Authorized activities include negotiations on terms for definitive agreements and financial, legal, or operational due diligence, including engagement of outside counsel or advisors. GL 131G expires on July 25, 2026.

    GL 131G does not authorize transactions to effectuate the actual sale, disposition, or transfer of any LIG entity or asset. Any contract entered into pursuant to GL 131G must expressly be made contingent upon the receipt of a separate authorization from OFAC. The goal of OFAC’s Russia sanctions is to place pressure on Moscow to end its war.

    As such, Treasury would evaluate any proposed sale of LIG based on factors that support U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. OFAC expects that, at a minimum, the proposed transaction must: completely sever LIG’s ties with Lukoil; block any funds owed to Lukoil until sanctions are lifted by placing them in an account subject to U.S. jurisdiction; and not provide a windfall to Lukoil, such as by providing up-front value to Lukoil, including through asset or share swaps. Further, as a condition of any future license for effectuating a sale of LIG, OFAC expects that it will require persons purchasing LIG’s assets to seek OFAC review before further divestment of material LIG assets.

    OFAC may revoke GL 131G at any time, including if Lukoil and LIG do not appear to be engaging in good faith negotiations regarding the divestment of LIG or its assets.

    Date Updated: June 25, 2026

    Updated on Jun 25, 2026

  • The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Venezuela-related General License 5X, “Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to the Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. 2020 8.5 Percent Bond on or After August 4, 2026;” Venezuela-related General License 24A, “Certain Transactions Involving the Government of Venezuela Related to Telecommunications and Mail Authorized;” and Venezuela-related General License 59, “Authorizing the Supply of Certain Items and Services Involving Consorcio Venezolano de Industrias Aeronáuticas y Servicios Aéreos, S.A. (Conviasa).”

    Additionally, OFAC is amending one Venezuela-related Frequently Asked Question, FAQ 595.

    New versions: GL 5X:

    and GL 24A:

    And new GL 59:

    And here’s the amended FAQ:

    595. What does Venezuela-related General License 5X authorize? 

    The President issued Executive Order (E.O.) 13835 on May 21, 2018. Subsection 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13835 prohibits U.S. persons from engaging in transactions related to the sale, transfer, assignment, or pledging as collateral by the Government of Venezuela (GOV) of any equity interest in an entity owned 50 percent or more by the GOV. One effect of subsection 1(a)(iii) is to require authorization before U.S. persons may engage in certain transactions regarding any equity interest in an entity owned 50 percent or more by the GOV. Subsequent to the issuance of E.O. 13835, OFAC received inquiries about how and whether subsection 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13835 could affect the ability to enforce bondholder rights to the CITGO shares serving as collateral for the Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA) 2020 8.5 percent bond. OFAC issued General License (GL) 5 on July 19, 2018, which removed E.O. 13835 as an obstacle to holders of the PdVSA 2020 8.5 percent bond gaining access to their collateral.

    General License 5 was replaced and superseded by General License 5A on October 24, 2019 with a delay in the effectiveness of the authorization in the general license. Since that date, OFAC has extended the delay in effectiveness multiple times. Most recently, OFAC issued General License 5X on June 18, 2026, which further delays the effectiveness of the authorization in GL 5 until August 4, 2026. Between October 24, 2019 and August 4, 2026 (the date the authorization in General License 5X becomes effective), there is no authorization in effect that licenses against subsection 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13835 applicable to the holders of the PdVSA 2020 8.5 percent bond. As a result, during such period, transactions related to the sale or transfer of CITGO shares in connection with the PdVSA 2020 8.5 percent bond are prohibited, unless specifically authorized by OFAC.

    To the extent an agreement may be reached on proposals to restructure or refinance payments due to the holders of the PdVSA 2020 8.5 percent bond, additional licensing requirements may apply. OFAC would encourage parties to apply for a specific license and would have a favorable licensing policy toward such an agreement.

    Date Updated: June 18, 2026

    Updated on Jun 18, 2026

  • The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Russia-related General License 55F, “Authorizing Certain Services Related to Sakhalin-2;” and Russia-related General License 115D, “Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Existing Civil Nuclear Energy Projects.”

    Additionally, OFAC is amending eight Russia-related Frequently Asked Questions, FAQs 967, 978, 999, 1011, 1117, 1182, 1203, and 1216.

    The GLs:

    and the FAQs:

    1216. What action has Treasury taken with regard to the provision of petroleum services to Russia? 

    In line with G7 efforts to reduce Russian revenues from energy, on January 10, 2025, Treasury issued a determination pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 prohibiting petroleum services to Russia. See The Determination Pursuant to Sections 1(a)(ii), 1(b), and 5 of E.O. 14071, Prohibition on Petroleum Services (“the Petroleum Services Determination”). This determination prohibits the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, to any person located in the Russian Federation of petroleum services. The Petroleum Services Determination took effect at 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on February 27, 2025. See FAQ 1217 for additional information.

    OFAC expects to issue regulations defining petroleum services to include services related to the exploration, drilling, well completion, production, refining, processing, storage, maintenance, transportation, purchase, acquisition, testing, inspection, transfer, sale, trade, distribution, or marketing of petroleum, including crude oil and petroleum products, as well as any activities that contribute to Russia’s ability to develop its domestic petroleum resources, or the maintenance or expansion of Russia’s domestic production and refining. This would include services related to natural gas as a byproduct of oil production in Russia.

    On October 22, 2025, OFAC issued GL 124A. In addition to continuing to authorize transactions prohibited by the Petroleum Services Determination related to the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) and Tengizchevroil, GL 124A also authorizes otherwise prohibited transactions related to the CPC and Tengizchevroil involving Lukoil, Rosneft, or any entity in which Lukoil or Rosneft owns, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. Additionally, on June 11, 2026, OFAC issued GL 55F, which extends authorizations for certain activities related to the Sakhalin-2 project that would otherwise be prohibited by the Petroleum Services Determination until December 18, 2026.

    The Petroleum Services Determination does not apply to (1) any petroleum services related to isotopes derived from petroleum manufacturing that are used for medical, agricultural, or environmental purposes, such as Carbon-13; (2) certain covered services related to the maritime transport of crude oil and petroleum products of Russian Federation origin purchased at or below the relevant price cap; and (3) any service in connection with the wind down or divestiture of an entity located in the Russian Federation that is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Russian person. See FAQ 1217 for additional information related to price cap related exclusions of the Petroleum Services Determination.

    Date Updated: June 11, 2026

    Updated on Jun 11, 2026

    Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions

    1203. What does General License (GL) 115D (“Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Civil Nuclear Energy”) authorize with respect to civil nuclear energy-related payments? 

    GL 115D generally authorizes certain transactions related to civil nuclear energy involving certain entities that are sanctioned pursuant to Executive Order 14024. Civil nuclear energy means the following activities when undertaken solely to maintain or support civil nuclear energy projects and operations initiated or under construction as of November 21, 2024: the extraction, production, refinement, conversion, enrichment, fabrication, transport, or purchase of uranium in any form; the production, generation, transmission, or exchange of nuclear power, fuel, or waste; and the operation of civil nuclear energy projects. However, GL 115D does not authorize, for instance, transactions involving certain sanctioned Russian financial institutions related to the development of new civil nuclear energy power plants after November 21, 2024.

    Non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. sanctions for engaging in transactions with blocked persons, including transactions related to existing civil nuclear energy as described in GL 115D, where those transactions would not require a specific license if engaged in by a U.S. person. See GL 132 for authorizations related to the Paks II civil nuclear power plant project in Hungary.

    Updated: June 11, 2026

    Updated on Jun 11, 2026

    Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions

    1182. Are foreign financial institutions (FFIs) subject to sanctions risk for providing all financial services involving persons blocked pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, as amended? What about agricultural, medical, and other transactions authorized by OFAC General Licenses? 

    Treasury remains focused on counteracting activity that involves sanctions evasion or third-country support to Russia’s military-industrial base. At the same time, legitimate humanitarian activity and agricultural and medical trade are not the target of our sanctions. Accordingly, FFIs may continue to conduct or facilitate any transaction(s) or provide any service related to activities that are otherwise authorized or exempted under the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions program. Foreign persons do not risk the imposition of sanctions for engaging in transactions authorized for U.S. persons under General Licenses issued under the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions program.

    FFIs may continue to rely on Treasury’s existing authorizations in place for transactions related to agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices and related replacement parts, components, or software updates, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (General License (GL) 6D), certain civil nuclear energy-related transactions (GLs 115D and 132), certain transactions in support of non-governmental organizations (GL 27), official business of third-country diplomatic or consular missions located in the Russian Federation (GL 20), certain transactions and official business of certain international organizations and entities by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof (31 CFR 587.510). Additionally, the importation or exportation of information or informational materials and transactions ordinarily incident to travel to or from any country are exempt under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

    See OFAC’s Advisory to Foreign Banks on Russia Sanctions Risks for additional guidance.

    Date Updated: June 11, 2026

    Updated on Jun 11, 2026

    Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions

    1117. My company provides goods or services to, or engages in trade with, persons that operate or have operated in the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy. Does my company risk being sanctioned by OFAC? 

    The determination made on February 24, 2023 pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 authorizes sanctions on any person determined to operate or have operated in the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy. Non-U.S. persons may also be exposed to sanctions for activities with persons blocked pursuant to E.O. 14024 (see FAQ 980), including persons blocked following a determination that such persons operate or have operated in the metals and mining sector.

    However, OFAC does not intend to target persons for operating in the metals and mining sector where the provision of goods or services is solely for the safety and care of personnel, protection of human life, prevention of accidents or injuries, maintenance or repair necessary to avoid environmental or other significant damage, or activities related to environmental mitigation or remediation. Examples of such goods include personal protective equipment, safety devices, ventilation systems, and alarm systems; examples of such services include rescue and accident response services, cleaning, safety inspections, and services necessary for use of the goods described above.

    In addition, non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. blocking sanctions under E.O. 14024 for engaging in transactions with blocked persons, including in the metals and mining sector, where those transactions would not require a specific license if engaged in by a U.S. person. For example, non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. blocking sanctions for engaging in transactions in the metals and mining sector if such transactions would be authorized for U.S. persons by General License (GL) 115D (authorizing certain civil nuclear energy-related transactions) or by GL 6D (authorizing certain transactions related to the production, manufacturing, sale, transport, or provision of medicine or medical devices, including certain industrial isotopes used in nuclear medicine, among other things).

    Date Updated: June 11, 2026

    Updated on Jun 11, 2026

    Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions

    1011. My U.S. bank refused to process a requested payment related to energy despite the authorization in Russia-related General License (GL) 115D under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024. What can I do? 

    The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) encourages persons to connect with their financial institution regarding the status of any payment. In addition, persons with questions about engaging in or processing transactions related to GL 115D can contact the OFAC Compliance Hotline.

    Updated: June 11, 2026

    Updated on Jun 11, 2026

    Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions

    999. What authorizations exist for entities subject to Directive 4 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, “Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation,” as amended (Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive)? 

    OFAC issued Russia-related General License (GL) 132 to authorize transactions involving the Paks II civil nuclear power plant project in Hungary, including those involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, that would be prohibited by the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive.

    OFAC issued Russia-related General License (GL) 115D to authorize civil nuclear energy-related transactions, including those involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, that would be prohibited by the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive.

    OFAC issued GL 13Q to authorize U.S. persons to pay taxes, fees, or import duties and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, or certifications, to the extent such transactions are prohibited by the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to such persons’ day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation. For further information on the types of transactions authorized by GL 13Q, see FAQ 1118.

    OFAC also issued GL 14, authorizing certain transactions involving any Directive 4 entity where the Directive 4 entity’s sole function in the transaction is to act as an operator of a clearing and settlement system. GL 14 does not authorize any transfer of assets to or from any Directive 4 entity, or any transaction where a Directive 4 entity is either a counterparty or beneficiary to the transaction. In addition, GL 14 does not authorize any debit to an account on the books of a U.S. financial institution of any Directive 4 entity. See FAQ 1003.

    Note that GL 13Q, GL 14, GL 115D, and GL 132 continue to authorize against the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive.

    Date Updated: June 11, 2026

    Updated on Jun 11, 2026

    Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions

    978. For transactions authorized under Russia-related General Licenses (GL) 6D, 7A, 115D, or 132, what is an example of a permissible funds transfer involving a foreign financial institution sanctioned pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024? 

    GLs 6D, 7A, or 115D, or 132 do not authorize a U.S. financial institution to maintain (or open) a correspondent account or payable-through account for or on behalf of entities subject to the prohibitions of Directive 2 under E.O. 14024, “Prohibitions Related to Correspondent or Payable-Through Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain Foreign Financial Institutions” (Russia-related CAPTA Directive). Consequently, in order for a U.S. financial institution to engage in transactions authorized under these GLs (e.g., a funds transfer related to energy), all such funds transfers must be processed indirectly through a non-sanctioned, non-U.S. financial institution.

    Examples of authorized and prohibited funds transfers under GLs 6D, 7A, 115D, and 132 include:

    Payment from third-country originator

    Authorized payment from third-country originator to beneficiary with an account at a sanctioned institution:

    Prohibited payment from third-country originator to beneficiary with an account at a sanctioned institution:
    Step process for prohibited payment starting from Third-Country Originator, to Third-Country Originating Bank, to U.S. Correspondent, to another U.S. Correspondent, to Target Entity, and finally to Beneficiary
     

    Payment from U.S. originator

    Authorized payment from U.S. originator to beneficiary with an account at a sanctioned institution:
    Step process for authorized payment starting from U.S. Person Originator, to U.S. Person Financial Institution, to U.S. Correspondent, to Third-Country Intermediary Bank, to Target Entity, and finally to Beneficiary

    Prohibited payment from U.S. originator to beneficiary with an account at a sanctioned institution:
    Step process for prohibited payment starting from U.S. Person Originator, to U.S. Person Financial Institution, to U.S. Correspondent, to Target Entity, and finally to Beneficiary

    In each of the above examples, the underlying funds transfer must be authorized under the applicable GL.

    Updated: June 11, 2026

    Updated on Jun 11, 2026

    Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions

    967. What does Directive 2 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, “Prohibitions Related to Correspondent or Payable-Through Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain Foreign Financial Institutions” (Russia-related CAPTA Directive) prohibit? 

    The Russia-related CAPTA Directive prohibits U.S. financial institutions from: (i) the opening or maintaining of a correspondent account or payable-through account for or on behalf of foreign financial institutions determined to be subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive; and (ii) the processing of transactions involving foreign financial institutions determined to be subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive. Please see the Russia-related CAPTA Directive for the definition of the terms “U.S. financial institution” and “foreign financial institution” for purposes of this directive. Please see FAQ 969 regarding the applicability of OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule with respect to this directive.

    Annex 1 to the Russia-related CAPTA Directive lists the foreign financial institutions determined to be subject to the prohibitions as of March 26, 2022. Foreign financial institutions determined to be subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive, including the foreign financial institutions listed in Annex 1, can be found on the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s (OFAC) List of Foreign Financial Institutions Subject to Correspondent Account or Payable-Through Account Sanctions (CAPTA List). Relevant entries on the CAPTA List will denote when a foreign financial institution became subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive, as well as when the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive come into effect with respect to that foreign financial institution.

    The below table identifies the dates the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive take effect for (i) foreign financial institutions listed in Annex 1 to the Russia-related CAPTA Directive, and (ii) foreign financial institutions otherwise determined to be subject to its prohibitions and added to the CAPTA List.

    Foreign Financial Institution TypeRelevant Sanctions Effective Date
    Foreign financial institutions listed in Annex 1 to the Russia-related CAPTA Directive12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on March 26, 2022
    Foreign financial institution otherwise determined to be subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive12:01 a.m. eastern time on the date that is 30 days after the date of such determination

    U.S. financial institutions must close any correspondent or payable-through account maintained for or on behalf of foreign financial institutions determined to be subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive, or their property or interests in property, by the relevant effective date. Separately, as of the relevant effective date, U.S. financial institutions may not process transactions involving foreign financial institutions determined to be subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive, or their property or interests in property, and must reject such transactions unless exempt or authorized by OFAC.

    Accordingly, after the relevant effective date, U.S. financial institutions must reject any transaction involving a foreign financial institution determined to be subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive or involving that foreign financial institution’s property or interests in property. This includes rejecting transactions related to any securities (including depositary receipts) issued by a foreign financial institution determined to be subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive, including secondary market trading. By virtue of the prohibition on the processing of transactions for or on behalf of foreign financial institutions determined to be subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive, U.S. financial institutions are also prohibited from engaging in transactions with a covered foreign financial institution in connection with the foreign financial institution’s role as a local custodian for depositary receipt issuances.

    The Russia-related CAPTA Directive does not impose blocking sanctions and, thus, does not require U.S. financial institutions (or other U.S. persons) to block the assets of foreign financial institutions determined to be subject to the prohibitions of this directive. However, U.S. persons should be aware that foreign financial institutions subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive may also be subject to additional prohibitions under other sanctions authorities, such as additional directives under E.O. 14024 or E.O. 13662.

    OFAC has issued several Russia-related general licenses (GLs)authorizing certain transactions involving the foreign financial institutions subject to the prohibitions of the Russia-related CAPTA Directive, including:

    • GL 6D: authorizing transactions related to (1) the production, manufacturing, sale, or transport of agricultural commodities, agricultural equipment, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices; (2) the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID-19 (including research or clinical studies relating to COVID-19); or (3) ongoing clinical trials and other medical research activities;
    • GL 7A: authorizing overflight payments, emergency landings, and air ambulance services;
    • GL 27: authorizing transactions in support of nongovernmental organizations’ activities; and
    • GL 115D: authorizing certain transactions related to civil nuclear energy.
    • GL 132: authorizing certain transactions involving Paks II civil nuclear power plant.

    On March 1, 2022, OFAC issued the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), which incorporate GL 5 in section 587.510 of the RuHSR.

    For additional information, please see FAQs 977, 978, 979, 981, 982 and 990.

    Date Updated: June 11, 2026

    Updated on Jun 11, 2026